Introduction
Organizations
improved capabilities, knowledge and skills of talented employees
proved to be a major source of competitive advantage in global market
(McKinsey, 2006). Hence, training is delivered by organization or an
external services. Training is a type of activity which is planned,
systematic and it results in enhanced level of skill, knowledge and
competency that are necessary to perform work effectively (Gordon,
1992). Training as the systematic application of formal processes to
impart knowledge and help employees to acquire require skills for
them to perform employee jobs satisfactorily (Armstrong, 2012).
Employee
development activities are very important for employees, as the
activities are performed, it indicates that organization cares about
employees and wants them to develop (Elena, 2000). Training and
development is increased employee performance, that training and
development is an important activity improves the performance of the
organization (Ahmad and Siraj-ud-din, 2009). When an employee
learning developed by the individual through experience. Employee
development depends upon the individual employee whether employee is
willing to participate or not. Employee development also depends upon
the organization culture, attitude of top management, and limited
opportunities of promotion (Elena, 2000; Antonacopoulou, 1996).
Training and development program is a responsibility of the
organizations to provide opportunities to employees but individual
should take initiative to use those opportunities for their
betterment of their future career (Garger, 1999).
As
a Kolb's Learning Cycle there's a four stages of effective of
learning in an employee individual progresses. (1)
having a concrete experience followed by (2) observation of and
reflection on that experience which leads to (3) the formation of
abstract concepts (analysis) and generalizations (conclusions) which
are then (4) used to test hypothesis in future situations, resulting
in new experiences.
Figure 01: Kolb's Learning Cycle
(Source: Saul, 2017)
Experience
Experience
in a leading Software Company, they have given technical, new tools,
new language and process training for their employees. Company is
provided various training session for employees to develop their
carrier and shaping their knowledge. After training sessions
employees could be able to use their gained knowledge to develop
innovative software product and carter to future markets.
Reflective
Observation
The
Organization is started new product development can be used new
technology for developments. Setup a team with having technology
savvy and assign them to development task. Employee who had the
training they can include innovative software developments. Some
employees are naturally good at reflection. Some of them are train
themselves to be more deliberate about reviewing their experiences
and recording them. Finally releasing new product to organization or
market.
The
formation of abstract concepts
After
developed new product, employee lean by experience and they can teach
others as well. All staff exchange their experience and knowledge
with their teams and apply for existing product.
Active
experimentation
After
learn from trainings employee apply those techniques in to new
product and use knowledge in to future developments.
1.
Benefit of the Effective of Learning and Training for Employees
Organization
and employees derive many benefits from training and development
programs.
1.1
Individual employee benefits
1.1.1
Improve career abilities
Employees
learn the soft and technical skills as required by individuals’
jobs. In last 30 years unemployment is at lowest rates which is not
beneficial for the workers to start new job, if opportunities for
growth are fewer (Dobbs, 2000). Fresh university graduates mostly
considering for a steady which provides qualifier training programs
to the employees, but this idea is risky for organizations to lose
fresh trained employees with couple of years (Feldman 2000).
Furthermore, helping employees to improve their skills and knowledge
to cope with the future requirements, lead to job satisfaction.
1.1.2
Employee Satisfaction
Happy
employees are extremely important because they represent the company
to the public. Satisfaction, however, is not linked solely to
compensation. Sure, a raise or benefits will probably improve
employee contentment, at least temporarily, but small, inexpensive
changes can have a long-term impact. Organizations which are willing
to spend money on their employees, give value to work with those
organizations, even though that investment eventually benefits the
organization (Inc.com, 2018)
.Organizations which are providing the training and development
programs for their employees are achieving high level of employee
satisfaction and low attrition (Wagner 2000). Training and
development increase organization’s reliability for reason that
employees recognize their organization is valuing in employee's
future career (Rosenwald, 2000).
1.1.3
Employee Performance.
Employee
Performance is an employee productivity and output as a result of
employee improvement. It goes without saying that the success of your
company largely depends on how well employees perform their tasks. We
would not be the first company to struggle with defining what that
looks like. Employee performance will finally affect the
organizational effectiveness. Training effects on behavior of
employees and their working skills which effected in enhanced
employee performance and further creative changes (Satterfield and
Hughes 2007) that serves as increase worker performance (Kraiger
2002). During an analysis concerning performance in India, Barber
(2004) originates that on-the-job training headed to superior novelty
and inherent skills. Professional and technical skills are very
essential for the employees to perform a job in an effective way.
Providing training opportunities to employees can better the
performance of the employees.
1.2
Organizational benefits
1.2.1
Market Growth
Employee
learning and training programs are important for any organization to
stay competitive in the market. Though it is costly for the
organization to spend the money on their employees but this
investment is positive for the organizations to hold the place in the
market. American Society for Training and Development mentioned two
motives that are significant for employee’s knowledge, first
employees identify the worth of training and marketable by
organization and second CEOs of the companies understand that how
fast information is transferring in current business environment
(Fenn, 1999). Organizations are required to develop and maintain such
learning and development environment for employees that expand the
knowledge of organization and competitive ability. (Greengard, 2000)
1.2.2.
Organizational Performance
Training
has been defined as primarily contributing factor to the
organizational effectiveness (Schuler and MacMillan, 1984).
Consideration on this topic recommends that investment in learning
and training development program can be justified by the impact it
creates to developed individual and organizational effectiveness
(Bartel, 2000)
1.2.3.
Employee Retention
Employee
retention is a challenging notion and there is no particular method
to retain employees with the organization. Right away, we've faced a
number of challenges to tackle on top of our daily responsibilities.
Not only do we have to find a replacement for such a talented team
member, skilled professionals are in high demand, as they are today
.But you also have to consider the impact this departure will have on
the rest of staff in an organization.
Whenever
someone walks out the door, people notice. Some will even start
wondering if they should start looking for a new job, too. That's why
employee retention and employee job satisfaction should be high on
every organization's list of priorities, and why creating effective
retention strategies to decrease turnover should be one of
management's most important jobs. Read on for our tips on building
strategies that are right for your company. Several organizations
have revealed that one of the characteristic that help to retain
employee is to offer them opportunities for improving their learning
(Logan 2000). Thus, it has confirmed that there is strong
relationship between employee training and development, and employee
retention (Rosenwald 2000).
2.
Research in Effective of Learning and Training for Employees
Reviewing
of various studies following are areas of interest
•
To investigate the importance of training.
•
To identify the importance of employee performance.
•
To investigate the relationship between Training and employee
performance.
In
the fast changing world of business and environmental uncertainty,
organizations realize its disadvantage of dealing with new challenges
(Tai, 2006). However further states that the organization should
invest in training programs to make their employees competent enough
to face uncertainties and take effective decision in time, in order
to remain competitive in the market. Effective training is beneficial
for the organization in variety of ways, such as, it plays a vital
role in building and maintaining capabilities, both on individual and
organizational level, and thus participates in the process of
organizational change (Valle, 2000).Furthermore, it indicates the
organization's long-term commitment towards its employees and
increases the employee’s motivational level (Pfeffer, 1994). All
these contributions lead to an achieving competitive benefit
(Youndtet al., 1996) and to an improvement in employee performance
and organizational productivity (Bartel, 1994; Delery and Doty,
1996).
Training
Effective
of learning and training programs target at employees' performance.
Training refers to improve the gap between the current performance
and the desired performance.
Employee
performances
Many
other research work on productivity of worker highlighted the fact
that employees who are satisfied with their job will have higher job
performance, and job retention, than those who are not happy with
their jobs (Landy, 1985) Furthermore, it is stated that employees are
more likely to leave if they are not satisfied and hence demotivated.
Employee performance is higher in happy and satisfied employees and
the management finds it easy to motivate high performers to achieve
organization targets. (Kinicki and Kreitner, 2007). The employee
could be only satisfied when they feel themselves qualified to
perform their jobs, which is achieved through effective training
programs.
The
relationship between training and employee performance.
Most
of the previous studies provides the evidence that there is a strong
positive relationship between human resource management practices and
organizational performance. (Purcell, 2003). According to Guest
(1997) mentioned in his study that training and development programs,
as one of the essential human resource management practice,
positively affects the quality of the workers knowledge, skills and
capability and thus results in higher employee performance on job.
This relation ultimately contributes to better organizational
performance. Training has the distinct role in the achievement of an
organizational goal by incorporating the interests of organization
and the workforce (Stone R J. Human Resource Management, 2002).
Training is the most significant factor in the business world because
training increases the efficiency and the effectiveness of both
employees and the organization. The employee performance depends on
various factors. But the most important factor of employee
performance is training (Ghafoor, 2011).
3.
Drawbacks of ineffective training programs
Learning
and training for employee are essential for any business, employers
should consider potential drawbacks that training employees can have
on the company, existing staff and bottom line. Companies can use a
several of ways to train employees, such as on-the-job training or
classroom training. Selecting a training method, employer facing the
advantages and disadvantage of the training and development.
3.1
Advantages of training employee
3.1.1
Employee turnover rate.
The training has a potential to change the
turnover thoughts and is an important factor that helps in
originating the intentions of turnover (Eva Kyndt et al, 2009). Those
employees that are highly committed to the organization have lower
turnover thoughts. Trainings basically bring association between
commitment and retention (Danlami Sani Abdul kadir et al, 2012). has
considered training as an investment, organization bears the whole
expenditures of training employees which eventually act as an
investor and expect a return in the form of commitment and retention
from employees. Trainings elevate commitment and retention rate, when
employees consider it as investment and force them to offer a return
to the organization. Alexandros Sahinidis and Bouris (2007) Training
is a long term investment in the skills of employees. Training is not
a tool to polish current skills of employees but to prepare employees
for future impacts from competitive forces. This kind of training
boosts the commitment and employees think that organization is
opening doors to our success. This sense eliminates the thoughts of
intentions to quit from employees mind and force them to retain.
Fheili (2007) has stated that employee turnover is a major human
capital risk for an organization, which needs to be catered.
Organizations that provide trainings which are specific in nature
applied only to the specific work within the organization that makes
the employees specialists not generalists. By doing this Organization
limits the employment opportunities and leads to the development of
committed employees and will eventually affect retention rate.
3.1.2
Reduce long-term staffing cost
When
employees having better training, then the company can improve
productivity and the bottom line. Training new employees, company
have to pay for more initial training costs. Effective learning and
training allows employer to lower companies long-term staffing cost
because of the satisfied employees are less to looking for new
employments (
Gaille, 2016 ; Lionbridge, 2014).
3.1.3
Increasing product knowledge
If
employees have better product and technology awareness, productivity
could be increased and further to do constructive changes
(Satterfield and Hughes, 2007). Employees share their product
knowledge and experience with others, then performed employee could
be in better position in the company (Kraiger, 2002). And they would
have good job satisfaction.
3.1.4
Working with team
When
employees training together it’s create a common goal and vision.
All employees work to common goal have created relationships that are
necessary for a team to co-exist in a meaningful way. An effective
training programs train employee to properly do their job, this
builds relationship among the team (Gaille,
2016 ; Lionbridge, 2014).
3.2
Disadvantages of training an employee
3.2.1
Training Cost
Today most of the organizations have built
up different programs for the training and development of their
employees. Generally companies offered education reimbursement
package to their employees so that they can improve their knowledge
and education. It has been found by the Corporate University that
almost 10 percent of employees are entitled for this benefit
(Rosenwald, 2000). It is most expensive method of developing
employee’s skill and knowledge in present situation. As a result,
many organizations conduct in-house training programs for their
employees that are more beneficial and cheap. Training section of the
organizations attempts to concentrate on particular job proficiency
whereas the corporate department is positive with an additional
strategic approach. Training and development program is a planned
education component and with exceptional method for sharing the
culture of the organization, which moves from one job skills to
understand the workplace skill, developing leadership, innovative
thinking and problem resolving (Meister, 1998). Employee development
programs includes a variety of teaching technique, schedule, and
helping learning environment that ensure employee to improve their
skills and later apply on their jobs (Gerbamn, 2000).
3.2.2
Compositors take skills
If
the organization spend money to train a new employee and new member
resign to join for a competitor, then the organization has spent
money for competitor. The employee can join any other company with
new skills and technology. Employees career development should be
established on bright career path which employee can easily accept
and gave it worth (Nunn 2000).
3.2.3
Increased Stress
Many
organizations offer continuous training to their employees.
Generally, continuous training is a good idea as it keeps employees
up to date on new trends and also keeps them knowledgeable in their
particular area of work. However, companies go overboard by requiring
their employees to complete an unrealistic number of hours of ongoing
training. This level of over-training can become very stressful to
the employee over time. And when employees are stressed, job
performance goes down.
4.
Organizational learning and training
Organizational
learning has been defined as a process of ‘cordinated systems
change, with mechanisms built in for individuals and groups to
access, build and use organizational memory, structure and culture to
develop long term organizational capacity’ (Marsick,1994)
Furthermore Reynolds (2004) has described a
learning culture as a ‘growth medium’ which will ‘encourage
employees to commit to a range of positive discretionary behaviors,
including learning’, and which has the following characteristics:
empowerment not supervision, self-managed learning not instruction,
long-term capacity building, not short-term fixes. As Reynolds
(2004) suggested that to create a learning culture it is necessary to
develop organizational practices that raise commitment amongst
employees and ‘give employees a sense of purpose in the workplace,
grant employees opportunities to act upon their commitment, and offer
practical support to learning’. The idea of a learning culture is
associated with that of the learning organization
(Reynolds, 2004).
5. Conclusion and recommendation
- Employee training is one of the suitable methods to improve and manage employee skills according to organization’s objectives and to improve the overall organizations’ performance.
- Organizations’ performance always depends upon performance of its employees, so effective training also plays an important role in increasing employees’ job motivation, satisfaction and commitment.
- Training is a kind of investment that needs more time, effort and money but this investment gives long term benefits to both organizations and employees.
- Effectiveness of training totally depends upon effectiveness and correct implementation of its model.
- Training progarmes save time and effort and set a direction to follow for conducting trainings.
- Training process can only be successful when participants are motivated to learn and excel their knowledge, skills and abilities.
6. Recommendation
- Training programs should be planned carefully by aligning the objectives of training with organizational objectives.
- Training programme must be developed to fulfill the specific needs.
- Model should be developed by involvement of group of expert persons, HR professionals, specific department heads that needs training, trainers (if they hire earlier or select from within the organization) and trainees also to avoid any future conflict.
- Supportive environment should be built within organization so that employees can freely communicate with their managers about their needs towards training.
- To avoid any problem in implementation and evaluation stages, it is necessary to design and develop all training activities, materials and methods timely and accurately.
- Disciplined environment must be given for implementation of training.
- Evaluation of training should be conducted at the spot right after closing the training program by taking feedback from both trainer and trainees along with the evaluation conducted at workplaces.
- Our proposed conceptual model is practical in usage because it facilitates the process of learning by making the content easy to understand, which provides the participants more alternatives to enhance their skills for the betterment of their careers.
7.
References
Abdulkadir, D. et al., 2012. Effects of
Strategic Performance Appraisal, Career Planning and Employee
Participation on Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Study.
International Business Research, 5(4), 124-133.
Antonacopoulou,
E.P. and FitzGerald, L. (1996).Reframing competency in management
development: a critique. Human
Resource Management Journal,
6(1), pp. 27-48.
Armstrong,
M. (2012). Armstrong’s Handbook
of Human Resource Management Practice.
United Kingdom: Ashford Colour Press.
Barber
J. (2004). Skill upgrading within informal training: lessons from the
Indian auto mechanic. International
Journal of Training and Development,
8,pp.28–39.
Bartel,
A.P. (2000). Measuring the Employer’s Return on Investment in
Training. Evidence from the
Literature. Industrial Relations,
39(3), PP.502–524.
Brum, S., 2007. What impact does training
have on employee commitment and employee turnover. Schmidt Labor
Research Center Seminar Research Series, 8 (3), 84-96.
Delery,
J.E. and Doty, D.H. (1996), Modes of theorizing in strategic human
resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency and
configurational performance predictions, Academy
of Management Journal, 39(4),
pp. 802-35
Dobbs,
K. (2000, April). Tires Plus takes the training high road. Training,
37 (4), 56-63.
Elena
P. Antonacopoulou, (2000), Employee development through self
-development in three retail banks, Journal
of Personnel Review, 29(4), pp.
491-508.
Feldman,
D. (2000, May). The Dilbert syndrome: How employee cynicism about
ineffective management is changing the nature of careers in
organizations. American
Behavioral Scientist, 43,
pp.1286-1301.
Fenn,
D. (1999, February). Corporate universities for small companies. Inc,
21 (2), 95-96.
Gaille
(2016), 10 Pros and Cons of Training Employees[online] Available at
https://brandongaille.com/10-pros-and-cons-of-training-employees/,
[Accessed on 20 September 2018]
Gerbman, R. V. (2000, February). Corporate
Universities 101. HR Magazine,
45 (2), 101-106.
Garger,
E. M. (1999, November). Goodbye training, hello learning Workforce,
78 (11), 35-42.
Ghafoor,
R.A., Khan, F.A. & Khan, D.M.A., 2011. Impact of Training and
Development on Organizational Performance. Global
Journal of Management and Business Research,
11(7).
Greengard,
S. (2000, June). Going the distance. Workforce, 79 (6), 22-23.
Gordon,
B. (1992) Are Canadian firms under in vesting in training? Canadian
Business Economics 1(1), pp.
25–33.
Guest,
D. (1997), Human resource management and performance: a review and
research agenda, International
Journal of Human Resource Management,
8(3), pp. 263-76.
Iftikhar
Ahmad and Siraj ud Din,Gomal Medical College and Gomal University,
D.I.Khan,Pakistan(2009),Evaluating
Training and Development.
Inc.com.
(2018). 7 Ways to Improve Employee Satisfaction. [online]
Available at:
https://www.inc.com/guides/201105/7-ways-to-improve-employee-satisfaction.html
[Accessed 8 Oct. 2018].
Impact
of Training on Employee Retention.
Available from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263808540_Impact_of_Training_on_Employee_Retention
[accessed Oct 05 2018].
Kinicki,
A. and Kreitner, R. (2007),Organizational
Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York,
NY.
Kraiger
K. (2002). Decision-based Evaluation. In Creating, Implementing, and
Maintaining Effective Training and Development, State-of-the-Art
Lessons for Practice, 1st
ed. K Kraiger, pp. 331–75. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Kyndt,
E. et al., 2009. Employee Retention:
Organizational and Personal Perspectives. Vocations and
Learning, 2, 195-215.
Landy,
F. W. (1985).The psychology of
work behavior, 3rd ed. Homewood,
IL: Dorsey Press.
Lionbridge
(2014), Top 5 Training and Development Challenges [online] Available
at http://content.lionbridge.com/top-td-challenges-address/,
[Accessed on 20 September 2018]
Saul
McLeod (2017), Kolb's Learning Styles and Experiential Learning Cycle
[online] Available at on
https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html[Accessed
on 13 September 2018]
Logan,
J. K. (2000, April). Retention tangibles and intangibles: More
meaning in work is essential, but good chair massages won’t hurt.
Training and Development,
54 (4), pp.48-50.
Marsick,
V J (1994) Trends in managerial invention: creating a learning map,
Management Learning,
21(1), pp 11–33 .
McKinsey
Quarterly (2006), An executive take on the top business trends, a
McKinsey Global Survey.
Meister, J. C. (1998, November). Ten steps
to creating a corporate university. Training
and Development, 52(11), 38-43.
Nunn, J. (2000, September/October). Career
planning key to employee retention. Journal of Property Management,
65 (5), 20-21.
Pfeffer,
J. (1994),Competitive Advantage
through People, Harvard Business
School Press, Boston, MA
Purcell,
J., Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Rayton, B. and Swart, J.
(2003),Understanding the People and Performance Link: Unlocking
the Black-Box. Research Report,
CIPD, London.
Reynolds,
J (2004) Helping People Learn,
CIPD, London
Rosenwald,
M. (2000, October 15) Working class: More companies are creating
corporate universities to help employees sharpen skills and learn new
ones. Boston Globe, H1.
Sadaf
Zahra, Amna Iram and Hummayoun Naeem (2014) Employee Training and
ItsEffect on Employees' Job Motivation and Commitment: Developing
andProposing a Conceptual Model, 6(1), pp. 60-68
Sahinidis, A. & Bouris, J., 2008.
Employee perceived training effectiveness relationship to employee
attitudes. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(1), 63-76.
Satterfield
JM, Hughes E. (2007). Emotion skills training for medical students: a
systematic review. Medical Education, 41:935–41.
Schuler,
R.S., and MacMillan, I.C. (1984). Gaining Competitive Advantage
through Human Resource Management Practices. Human Resource
Management, 23, 3, 241–255.
Sloman,
M (2003) E-learning: stepping up the learning curve, Impact, CIPD,
January, pp 16–17
Stone R J. (2002), Human Resource
Management 2nd Edition, Jhon Wiley & Sons 2002.
Tai,
W. T., (2006). Effects of Training Framing, General Self-efficacy and
Training Motivation on Trainees’ Training Effectiveness, Emerald
Group Publishers, 35(1), pp. 51-65.
Valle,
R., Martı´n, F., Romero, P.M. and Dolan, S. (2000), “Business
strategy, work processes and human resource training: are they
congruent?”,Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, pp. 283-97
Wagner,
S. (2000, August). Retention: Finders, keepers. Training and
Development, 54 (8), 64.
Wilson,
C. (2000, July 26). More companies recognize the impact of learning
centers. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, C8.
Youndt,
M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. and Lepak, D.P. (1996), “Human
resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm
performance”,Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp.
836-66.

Hi Gayanee,Job Well done.Your blog has covered the key aspects of Learning & Development. After all I believe that Training needs assessment as well.Noe (2013) indicates that training needs assessment concerns the process of finding out if training is required/needed or not. Three analyses are performed: employee (personal),
ReplyDeleteorganizational and task (job) analyses. Firdousi (2011) is of the view that training needs analysis is used to investigate the educational courses or activities to be given to both employees and
management in a bid to enhance their delivery.
As I agree with your comment Akila, Barbazette (2006) says, that training needs assessment is the process of collecting data to training employee in order to achieve organizational needs. McConnell (2003) highlighted that training needs analysis is needed when there are changes in the system or in the work, when new technology is initiated, when new government’s standards are introduced, when there is decline in the quality of work or performance, when there is lack of skills and knowledge and when there is lack of motivation.
DeleteGayanee, your blog is clearly emphasize the effects of implementing proper training and development in an organisation that has a greater propensity to increase employee engagement through effective performance management. In addition Herman and Kurt (2009) consider
ReplyDeletetraining as the systematic approach to affecting individuals’ knowledge, skills, and attitude in order to improve individual, team, and organizational effectiveness.
Thanks for the comment Lasitha. According to Armstrong (2012) training as the systematic presentation of formal processes to impart knowledge and help workers to obtain required skills for them to perform their jobs satisfactorily. This definition corroborated with Olakunle and Ehi (2008), who see training as the methodical development of the knowledge, skill and attitude required by an individual employee to perform effectively on a given task or job.
DeleteI agree with your idea about learning and training. It is one of the major factors that could help to increase the productivity of the organization directly or indirectly. I accept your statement about connecting the training and learning with the performance appraisal. According to Paul, Abeguki, Hezekiah and JoyIfiavor (2014), the performance appraisal will be helpful to identify the areas where the employees need to be trained. Therefore, for an effective training and learning procedure I recommend the organization should do a proper systematic performance appraisal first.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Vayanga. I agree with you. Performance Appraisal has been considered as the most significant an indispensable tool for an organization, for the information it provides is highly useful in making decisions regarding various personnel aspects such as promotion and value increases.
DeleteThat employee performance is the Important factor and the building block which increases the performance of overall organization. Employee performance depends on many factors like job satisfaction, knowledge and management. But there is a relationship between training and performance (Chris Amisano,2010).This shows that employee performance is essential for the performance of the organization and the training & development is advantageous for the employee to improve their performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to show the impact training & development on the employee performance
Gayanee, Your blog emphasizes in all areas of Learning and Training Employees for the betterment of the Organizations. Training is the process of teaching employees the basic skills they need to perform their jobs or for developing additional skills. The firms training programs must makes sense in terms of the companies strategic goal. Training programs must also support Performance Management. This is a integrated goal oriented approach for assigning, assessing and rewarding performance. Training is one way to help an employee meet their performance goals as you have explained in the training process. According to Dipak (2011) Training Programs are so designed, that it can meet the skill and knowledge gap, as could be Identified through the performance management process.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the commenting. Mangers are planning their level best to develop the capabilities, to creating good working environment within the organization (Farooq and Aslam,2011). For the sake of capacity creating managers are involved in developing the effective training programs for their employees to equip them with the desired knowledge, skills and abilities to achieve organizational goals. This struggle by the top management not only improves the employee performance but also creates positive image of the firm worldwide, (Jia-Fang, 2010).
DeleteHi Gayanee, you have clearly explained the effectiveness of learning and training for employees in your blog. However, the organizations do not always offer the right training forms and contents for their employees and the wrong allocation of training contents and training forms can be considered as one of the main causes for the lower effectiveness of training provided to the employees. Especially, training provided for the older employees of an organization is less effective since it appears that the older employees pursue less ambitious goals with their participation in training activities carried out by the organization (Zwick, 2011).
ReplyDeleteThank you, Dinuka for the comment made and I agree with you. But It is very necessary for the organization to design the training very carefully (MichaelArmstrong, 2000). The design of the training should be according to the needs of the employees (Ginsberg, 1997). Those organizations which develop a good training design according to the need of the employees as well as to the organization always get good results (Partlow, 1996; Tihanyi,2000; Boudreauet, 2001).
DeleteKey parameters influencing effective L & D practice incldes scale of organizational setting. Price (2007) described the relationship between organizational scale and HRD practices, where larger organizations are more positive towards potential benefits of L&D, although small to medium enterprises are placing more value on L&D in their business strategy. Secondly organizational engagement to L&D may vary with the extent to which the organization adopts strategic versus traditional approach (CIPD, 2015). The emerging theory of HRD and OD strategic approach to L&D would be the most effective way to activate human potential for organizational growth where there is alignment between different L&D initiatives and programmes within an organization.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the comment and I exactly agree with you Samanthi. It is therefore in the organizations responsibility to enhance the job performance of the employees and certainly implementation of training and development is one of the major steps that most companies need to achieve this. As is evident that employees are a crucial resource, it is important to optimize the contribution of employees to the company aims and goals as a means of sustaining effective performance. This therefore calls for managers to ensure an adequate supply of staff that is technically and socially competent and capable of career development into specialist departments or management positions (Afshan, Sobia, Kamran & Nasir 2012, 646).
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Gayanee, The Learning and Training attracting the interests of corporations as a potential way to enhance training effectiveness. According to (Bachvarova et al, 2012), there are three factors which needs to be looked at when designing learning with corporate training;
DeleteThe current situation of modern organizations
The different stakeholders in corporate training
and
Relations between features and how they impact learning
Thank you for comment Ruwini. There are some factors which affect training effectiveness both positively and negatively (Punia & Kant, 2013). It also different from physical and financial investments, investment in training brings a distinct advantage to organizations because training enhances organizational performance. It does this through increasing the skills, motivation and knowledge of employees. Thus, the intellectual capital of organizations is increased. Moreover, it is argued that training within organizations creates a resource that is more valuable than any other, that is, committed employees (Jex & Britt, 2008).
DeleteGayanee, you have illustrated effectiveness of learning and training of employees in your blog critically. As another aspect, there are certain factors influencing your subject. According to Birdi (2005) there are two factors affecting to the effective training. These are Individual factors and organizational factors. Driskell (2011) stated that way of training conducted, training content and training expertise equally affect the results of training.
ReplyDeleteCertainly agree with your comments Shiran, As mention training content and quality of the the training is very important for effectiveness of training. Another aspect of delivery style is a very important part of Training and Development (Carlos,1995). Employees are well knowledgeable about the delivery style (Michael, 2000). If someone is not delivering the training in an impressive style and he/she is not capturing the attention of the audience it is means he/she is wasting the time (Mark A. Griffin et al., 2000). It is very important for a trainer to engage its audience during the training session (Phillipseamen et al., 2005).
DeleteWell done Gayanee, you have managed to capture the most important areas on learning, training and development. However Return on Investment (ROI) measurement is one of the methods to evaluate the effectiveness of a training and development programme (Sachdeva*, 2014). Executives and Programme Directors that have watched their training budget grow without appropriate accountability measures are now demanding a ROI on training investment (Rohs,2004,p.29).
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Bernadine. Why an organization invest for employee training, that trainings increase or develop the managerial skills (Robart and Frank, 1998).Organizations spending on training should increase on efficiency and cost control, because organization get more efficiency , effectiveness out of the training and development (workforce special report, 2006) .This shows that training increase the efficiency and the effectiveness of the organization.
DeleteHi Gayanee,
ReplyDeleteInteresting Topic & Valuable content. As you share Learning and training increase the stress level of employee instead of Motivation is very important and valid point. In present working environment this reason can be seen amply and all employers must pay their attention on this. Because Business success is based on many factors and the most important to have competent, skillful and motivated workforce. These skills, competencies, knowledge and motivation can be enhanced through training (Adam, 1963). Therefore training and learning must be designed in order to increase the motivation
Further Swart et al, says organizations are needed to retain human asset by keeping them motivated through effective trainings for further development and to enhance their skills for betterment and success of the company (Swart et al, 2005)
Thank you for your comment Suresh. Improved capabilities, knowledge and skills of the talented workforce proved to be a major source of competitive advantage in a global market (McKinsey, 2006). To develop the desired knowledge, skills and abilities of the workers, to perform well on the job, requires effective training programs that may also effect employee motivation and commitment (Meyer and Allen, 1991)
DeleteDear Gayanee, I totally agreed what you have pointed out on effectiveness in learning and Training for employees, it is true that there can be disadvantages in training were organization will spend lots of resources but the benefit will goes to some were else. This is mainly due to the reason of not analyzing and determining the actual need of leaning and development of the organization. According to Armstrong (2006) by identified the actual need and structuring the leaning and development of the organization and recognizing these employees, empowering them rewording can mitigate these disadvantages.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Charith. Organization always get better advantage which develop a good training design according to the need of the workers as well as to the organization. (Partlow, 1996; Tihanyi et al., 2000; Boudreau et al., 2001). It seems that Training design plays a very essential role in the employee as well as organizational performance. The unplanned training design is nothing but the loss of time and money (Tsaur and Lin, 2004).
DeleteGayanee, your efforts are commendable in elaborating the importance of L & D in HRM context. It is further learnt that L & D should align with the strategy of the organization & ensure that employees have the relevant skills and knowledge needed to be able to execute the HR strategy (Mavin et al, 2010).
ReplyDeleteThis is a continuous process. As and when the strategies are updated or refocused it will be necessary to review the learning and development processes as well and therefore an ongoing dialogue is needed between those responsible for learning and development and the management of the organization. The Kirkpatrick Model helps organizations to carry out such exercise to align the L & D with strategy. And the knowledge of similar models will further improve such alignments.
Thank you for your comment Amal, I agree with your comment, where the Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model could help objectively analyze the effectiveness and impact of organization training.
DeleteAccording to Farooq. M, & Aslam. M. K (2011), managers are trying their level best to develop the employee’s capabilities, ultimately creating good working environment within the organization. For the sake of capacity developing managers are participating in develop the effective training programs for their employees to equip them with the desired knowledge, skills and abilities to achieve organizational goals. This effort by the top management not only improves the worker performance but also creates positive image of the organization worldwide, (Jia-Fang, 2010).
Learning and development(L&D) is one of the key areas that successful organization have made provisions on their Strategic Human Resources Management process. L&D directly affects individual productivity and performance which determines the firms success. Therefore the importance of cultivating a Learning culture among the organization is critically stated by Armstrong M,(2009,p.175-182)
ReplyDeleteThe blog successfully describes important arears where it is truly relevant to its topic in a complete manner.
As I agree with you comment Chaminda, effective training programs helps employees to get familiarity with the desired new technological advancement, also gaining full command on the abilities and skills required to perform at s particular job and to void on the job errors and mistakes (Robert, 2006).
DeleteWell done. Your blog has been covered important key aspects of Learning and development which is vital for any organization. I believe that employees will leave their work place when they are no longer Leaning and development. Even old employees or new employees it is essential to arrange a training sessions to increase their Morales. Employee development is a shared responsibility of management and individual employees.
ReplyDeleteSelan Bank is allocating training programs for their employees when they giving yearly appraisals. Every organization should identity the necessity of training and development for their employees to increase the productivity and the motivations.
Thank you for your comment Udeni, It is very difficult for an employee to perform well at the job place without any per-training (Thomas N. Garavan, 1997).The Seylan bank is identified training needs of the employees and provide per-training for their employees. Trained employees perform well as compared to untrained employees (Partlow, 1996; Tihanyi etal.,2000; Boudreau et l.,2001).
DeleteHi Gayanee you have clearly identified effective learning and training can help the employee to gain efficiency through performance management. Reynolds (2004: 3) observed that: The simple act of observing more experienced colleagues can accelerate learning; conversing, swapping stories, cooperating on tasks and offering mutual support deepen and solidify the process... This kind of learning – often very informal in nature – is thought to be vastly more effective in building proficiency than more formalized training methods.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Mohan, It is very necessary for any organization to give its employees training to get overall goals of the organization in a better way (Flynn et al.,1995; Kaynak, 2003; Heras, 2006). Training and development increase the overall performance of the organization (Shepard, Jon et al., 2003)
DeleteDear Gayanee , You have clearly mentioned effectiveness of Training and Learning to the Company and also Employee , Thus Training presents a prime opportunity to expand the knowledge base of all employees, but many employers in the current climate find development opportunities expensive. Employees attending training sessions also miss out on work time which may delay the completion of projects. However despite these potential drawbacks, training and development provides both the individual and organisations as a whole with benefits that make the cost and time a worthwhile investment. The return on investment from training and development of employees is really a no brainer (Stone , 2002)
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Ajantha, In addition Bartel (1994), reports that there is a positive correlation between effective training program and employee productivity, however to make it achievable, (Swart et al., 2005), it is the responsibility of the managers to identify the factors that prevents training program effectiveness and should take necessary measures to neutralize their effect on employee performance
DeleteHi Gayanee , Well descriptive Blog on the Effectiveness of Learning and Training for Employees . I totally agree with your explanations ,where the Effective training practices should establish to gain the expected outcome ,benefits from particular training or training programs . The focus of the training should be to develop transferable skills. The training should be evaluated on the basis of the extent to which it has achieved its purpose (Armstrong and Taylor , 2014) .Lack of Effectiveness of the Learning and Training processes incur only a cost to the organization .
ReplyDeleteAs I agree with your comment Kasun , However it is costly to give training to the employees. But in the long run it give back more than benefits to organization. (Flynn et al.,1995; Kaynak, 2003; Heras, 2006). All organizations should develop its employees according to the need of current situation. So that they could compete with their competitors (Carlos A. Primo Braga, 1995)
DeleteGayanee you have very well described the necessity of learning and development. It is when an employee if fully equipped with the required knowledge and skills that he or she can contribute significantly. However, as discussed in the Blog, the level of absorbing the knowledge that is to be imparted with various training and development programs conducted differs from one to the other. Hence, in order to retain those who absorb more and faster who would eventually become the nucleus of the company has to be taken care of. “if the company wishes to reduce the chances of its employees expressing intentions to leave, it is important that they are highly satisfied with their job and company as a whole. They also recommended that having a standard payment policy and effective ways of supervising as methods of reducing turnover intentions” (mbah and Ikemefuna, 2012).
ReplyDeleteGAYANE You have presented in a attractive manner which elaborate the theory .In the view of Armstrong (2014: 284), development is considered as the growth or realization of person’s ability and the potential through the provision of learning and educational experiences.
ReplyDeletePedler et al (1991) state that a learning organization is one ‘which facilitates the learning of all its members and continually transforms itself’.A learning culture is one that promotes learning because it is recognized by top management, line managers and employees generally as an essential organizational process to which they are committed and in which they engage continuously.
ReplyDelete@Gayanee Thennakoon Many researches have conducted studies on the impact of an efficient Training & Development structure within organizations. One of the interesting findings in these studies, claimed that there is a direct link between employees’ attitudes and the perceived capabilities or skills for specific a job role and how this realization can be a motivational factor for job performance proficiencies at later stages. If there is a mismatch between perceived capability to the actual skills required performing a job, dissatisfaction can occur with a higher risk of employee turn over. Therefore, it vital that in any T&D program that expectations are clearly cited and competencies required are addressed from the early stages (Truitt, 2011).
ReplyDeleteOrganisations which are intense to develop their productivity, efficiency and profitability will look to move beyond mandatory training and look at more varied learning and development activities which will enable the employees to maximise their potential and provide a valuable resource for the organisation. Learning and development can be a source of competitive advantage where employees gain appropriate new knowledge and skills (Towler and Dipboye, 2009) which provides a strong argument for organisations to invest in their employees so that they can reap the benefits and differentiate themselves from their competitors.
ReplyDeleteIt was a nice read Gayanee, however according to (John P, 2005)stated that High performance working practices consist of new ways of organizing work. Rewarding performance and involving employees in the decision-making process in the workplace. The practices include self-directed teams, performance-related pay, 360-degree appraisal, personal development plans, job rotation, employee involvement with decision-making, and support for performance: that is, training and development.
ReplyDeleteGood work Gayanee.Training should have a purpose — To inform, to teach, to improve, and to teach Introducing evaluation and tying it to performance will identify if learning has occurred during and after training, and if job performance improvements have been realized. Measuring improvements in job performance will also provide valuable data for measuring the cost-benefits to the organization.No programs are developed and implemented unless they are guaranteed to produce results that are identified as critical to the organization.
ReplyDeleteDear Gayanee,I highly agreed with you as you have mentioned Training is an Investment which gives long term benefit to both employee and the organization.Employee training and development has emerged as a major educational enterprise over the past three decades. This increase is associated with a demand in the workplace for employee at all levels to improve performance in their present jobs to acquire skills and knowledge to do new jobs, and to continue their career progress in a changing world of work(Armstrong,2001).Training effects employee's job performance positively. Training is a motivational factor which enhances the knowledge of the employee towards the job by which employees become proficient in their jobs and they become able to give better results.Training has direct relationship with the employees' performance. A significant relationship was found between the employees training and their resultant performance in accomplishing different tasks. By the help of training employees become proficient in their jobs and they become able to give better results(Bhat,2013).
ReplyDeleteHi Gayanee, this is a very comprehensive blog. Training is a long term investment for any organization and it will enhances company reputation and profile by having a strong and successful training strategy helps to develop your employer brand and make your company a prime consideration for graduates and mid-career changes. Training also makes a company more attractive to potential new recruits who seek to improve their skills and the opportunities associated with those new skills (International Journal of Management and International Business Studies, 2014).
ReplyDelete