Friday, October 5, 2018

The Effectiveness of Learning and Training for Employees


Introduction

Organizations improved capabilities, knowledge and skills of talented employees proved to be a major source of competitive advantage in global market (McKinsey, 2006). Hence, training is delivered by organization or an external services. Training is a type of activity which is planned, systematic and it results in enhanced level of skill, knowledge and competency that are necessary to perform work effectively (Gordon, 1992). Training as the systematic application of formal processes to impart knowledge and help employees to acquire require skills for them to perform employee jobs satisfactorily (Armstrong, 2012).
Employee development activities are very important for employees, as the activities are performed, it indicates that organization cares about employees and wants them to develop (Elena, 2000). Training and development is increased employee performance, that training and development is an important activity improves the performance of the organization (Ahmad and Siraj-ud-din, 2009). When an employee learning developed by the individual through experience. Employee development depends upon the individual employee whether employee is willing to participate or not. Employee development also depends upon the organization culture, attitude of top management, and limited opportunities of promotion (Elena, 2000; Antonacopoulou, 1996). Training and development program is a responsibility of the organizations to provide opportunities to employees but individual should take initiative to use those opportunities for their betterment of their future career (Garger, 1999).
As a Kolb's Learning Cycle there's a four stages of effective of learning in an employee individual progresses. (1) having a concrete experience followed by (2) observation of and reflection on that experience which leads to (3) the formation of abstract concepts (analysis) and generalizations (conclusions) which are then (4) used to test hypothesis in future situations, resulting in new experiences.

Figure 01: Kolb's Learning Cycle
 








(Source: Saul, 2017)
 
Experience
Experience in a leading Software Company, they have given technical, new tools, new language and process training for their employees. Company is provided various training session for employees to develop their carrier and shaping their knowledge. After training sessions employees could be able to use their gained knowledge to develop innovative software product and carter to future markets.
Reflective Observation
The Organization is started new product development can be used new technology for developments. Setup a team with having technology savvy and assign them to development task. Employee who had the training they can include innovative software developments. Some employees are naturally good at reflection. Some of them are train themselves to be more deliberate about reviewing their experiences and recording them. Finally releasing new product to organization or market.
The formation of abstract concepts
After developed new product, employee lean by experience and they can teach others as well. All staff exchange their experience and knowledge with their teams and apply for existing product.
Active experimentation
After learn from trainings employee apply those techniques in to new product and use knowledge in to future developments.


1. Benefit of the Effective of Learning and Training for Employees
Organization and employees derive many benefits from training and development programs.
1.1 Individual employee benefits
1.1.1 Improve career abilities
Employees learn the soft and technical skills as required by individuals’ jobs. In last 30 years unemployment is at lowest rates which is not beneficial for the workers to start new job, if opportunities for growth are fewer (Dobbs, 2000). Fresh university graduates mostly considering for a steady which provides qualifier training programs to the employees, but this idea is risky for organizations to lose fresh trained employees with couple of years (Feldman 2000). Furthermore, helping employees to improve their skills and knowledge to cope with the future requirements, lead to job satisfaction.


1.1.2 Employee Satisfaction
Happy employees are extremely important because they represent the company to the public. Satisfaction, however, is not linked solely to compensation. Sure, a raise or benefits will probably improve employee contentment, at least temporarily, but small, inexpensive changes can have a long-term impact. Organizations which are willing to spend money on their employees, give value to work with those organizations, even though that investment eventually benefits the organization (Inc.com, 2018) .Organizations which are providing the training and development programs for their employees are achieving high level of employee satisfaction and low attrition (Wagner 2000). Training and development increase organization’s reliability for reason that employees recognize their organization is valuing in employee's future career (Rosenwald, 2000).


1.1.3 Employee Performance.
Employee Performance is an employee productivity and output as a result of employee improvement. It goes without saying that the success of your company largely depends on how well employees perform their tasks. We would not be the first company to struggle with defining what that looks like. Employee performance will finally affect the organizational effectiveness. Training effects on behavior of employees and their working skills which effected in enhanced employee performance and further creative changes (Satterfield and Hughes 2007) that serves as increase worker performance (Kraiger 2002). During an analysis concerning performance in India, Barber (2004) originates that on-the-job training headed to superior novelty and inherent skills. Professional and technical skills are very essential for the employees to perform a job in an effective way. Providing training opportunities to employees can better the performance of the employees.
1.2 Organizational benefits
1.2.1 Market Growth
Employee learning and training programs are important for any organization to stay competitive in the market. Though it is costly for the organization to spend the money on their employees but this investment is positive for the organizations to hold the place in the market. American Society for Training and Development mentioned two motives that are significant for employee’s knowledge, first employees identify the worth of training and marketable by organization and second CEOs of the companies understand that how fast information is transferring in current business environment (Fenn, 1999). Organizations are required to develop and maintain such learning and development environment for employees that expand the knowledge of organization and competitive ability. (Greengard, 2000)
1.2.2. Organizational Performance
Training has been defined as primarily contributing factor to the organizational effectiveness (Schuler and MacMillan, 1984). Consideration on this topic recommends that investment in learning and training development program can be justified by the impact it creates to developed individual and organizational effectiveness (Bartel, 2000)


1.2.3. Employee Retention
Employee retention is a challenging notion and there is no particular method to retain employees with the organization. Right away, we've faced a number of challenges to tackle on top of our daily responsibilities. Not only do we have to find a replacement for such a talented team member, skilled professionals are in high demand, as they are today .But you also have to consider the impact this departure will have on the rest of staff in an organization.
Whenever someone walks out the door, people notice. Some will even start wondering if they should start looking for a new job, too. That's why employee retention and employee job satisfaction should be high on every organization's list of priorities, and why creating effective retention strategies to decrease turnover should be one of management's most important jobs. Read on for our tips on building strategies that are right for your company. Several organizations have revealed that one of the characteristic that help to retain employee is to offer them opportunities for improving their learning (Logan 2000). Thus, it has confirmed that there is strong relationship between employee training and development, and employee retention (Rosenwald 2000).


2. Research in Effective of Learning and Training for Employees
Reviewing of various studies following are areas of interest
• To investigate the importance of training.
• To identify the importance of employee performance.
• To investigate the relationship between Training and employee performance.
In the fast changing world of business and environmental uncertainty, organizations realize its disadvantage of dealing with new challenges (Tai, 2006). However further states that the organization should invest in training programs to make their employees competent enough to face uncertainties and take effective decision in time, in order to remain competitive in the market. Effective training is beneficial for the organization in variety of ways, such as, it plays a vital role in building and maintaining capabilities, both on individual and organizational level, and thus participates in the process of organizational change (Valle, 2000).Furthermore, it indicates the organization's long-term commitment towards its employees and increases the employee’s motivational level (Pfeffer, 1994). All these contributions lead to an achieving competitive benefit (Youndtet al., 1996) and to an improvement in employee performance and organizational productivity (Bartel, 1994; Delery and Doty, 1996). 
Training
Effective of learning and training programs target at employees' performance. Training refers to improve the gap between the current performance and the desired performance.
Employee performances
Many other research work on productivity of worker highlighted the fact that employees who are satisfied with their job will have higher job performance, and job retention, than those who are not happy with their jobs (Landy, 1985) Furthermore, it is stated that employees are more likely to leave if they are not satisfied and hence demotivated. Employee performance is higher in happy and satisfied employees and the management finds it easy to motivate high performers to achieve organization targets. (Kinicki and Kreitner, 2007). The employee could be only satisfied when they feel themselves qualified to perform their jobs, which is achieved through effective training programs.
The relationship between training and employee performance.
Most of the previous studies provides the evidence that there is a strong positive relationship between human resource management practices and organizational performance. (Purcell, 2003). According to Guest (1997) mentioned in his study that training and development programs, as one of the essential human resource management practice, positively affects the quality of the workers knowledge, skills and capability and thus results in higher employee performance on job. This relation ultimately contributes to better organizational performance. Training has the distinct role in the achievement of an organizational goal by incorporating the interests of organization and the workforce (Stone R J. Human Resource Management, 2002). Training is the most significant factor in the business world because training increases the efficiency and the effectiveness of both employees and the organization. The employee performance depends on various factors. But the most important factor of employee performance is training (Ghafoor, 2011).


3. Drawbacks of ineffective training programs
Learning and training for employee are essential for any business, employers should consider potential drawbacks that training employees can have on the company, existing staff and bottom line. Companies can use a several of ways to train employees, such as on-the-job training or classroom training. Selecting a training method, employer facing the advantages and disadvantage of the training and development.


3.1 Advantages of training employee
3.1.1 Employee turnover rate.
The training has a potential to change the turnover thoughts and is an important factor that helps in originating the intentions of turnover (Eva Kyndt et al, 2009). Those employees that are highly committed to the organization have lower turnover thoughts. Trainings basically bring association between commitment and retention (Danlami Sani Abdul kadir et al, 2012). has considered training as an investment, organization bears the whole expenditures of training employees which eventually act as an investor and expect a return in the form of commitment and retention from employees. Trainings elevate commitment and retention rate, when employees consider it as investment and force them to offer a return to the organization. Alexandros Sahinidis and Bouris (2007) Training is a long term investment in the skills of employees. Training is not a tool to polish current skills of employees but to prepare employees for future impacts from competitive forces. This kind of training boosts the commitment and employees think that organization is opening doors to our success. This sense eliminates the thoughts of intentions to quit from employees mind and force them to retain. Fheili (2007) has stated that employee turnover is a major human capital risk for an organization, which needs to be catered. Organizations that provide trainings which are specific in nature applied only to the specific work within the organization that makes the employees specialists not generalists. By doing this Organization limits the employment opportunities and leads to the development of committed employees and will eventually affect retention rate.


3.1.2 Reduce long-term staffing cost
When employees having better training, then the company can improve productivity and the bottom line. Training new employees, company have to pay for more initial training costs. Effective learning and training allows employer to lower companies long-term staffing cost because of the satisfied employees are less to looking for new employments ( Gaille, 2016 ; Lionbridge, 2014).
3.1.3 Increasing product knowledge
If employees have better product and technology awareness, productivity could be increased and further to do constructive changes (Satterfield and Hughes, 2007). Employees share their product knowledge and experience with others, then performed employee could be in better position in the company (Kraiger, 2002). And they would have good job satisfaction.
3.1.4 Working with team
When employees training together it’s create a common goal and vision. All employees work to common goal have created relationships that are necessary for a team to co-exist in a meaningful way. An effective training programs train employee to properly do their job, this builds relationship among the team (Gaille, 2016 ; Lionbridge, 2014).
3.2 Disadvantages of training an employee
3.2.1 Training Cost
Today most of the organizations have built up different programs for the training and development of their employees. Generally companies offered education reimbursement package to their employees so that they can improve their knowledge and education. It has been found by the Corporate University that almost 10 percent of employees are entitled for this benefit (Rosenwald, 2000). It is most expensive method of developing employee’s skill and knowledge in present situation. As a result, many organizations conduct in-house training programs for their employees that are more beneficial and cheap. Training section of the organizations attempts to concentrate on particular job proficiency whereas the corporate department is positive with an additional strategic approach. Training and development program is a planned education component and with exceptional method for sharing the culture of the organization, which moves from one job skills to understand the workplace skill, developing leadership, innovative thinking and problem resolving (Meister, 1998). Employee development programs includes a variety of teaching technique, schedule, and helping learning environment that ensure employee to improve their skills and later apply on their jobs (Gerbamn, 2000).

3.2.2 Compositors take skills
If the organization spend money to train a new employee and new member resign to join for a competitor, then the organization has spent money for competitor. The employee can join any other company with new skills and technology. Employees career development should be established on bright career path which employee can easily accept and gave it worth (Nunn 2000).
3.2.3 Increased Stress
Many organizations offer continuous training to their employees. Generally, continuous training is a good idea as it keeps employees up to date on new trends and also keeps them knowledgeable in their particular area of work. However, companies go overboard by requiring their employees to complete an unrealistic number of hours of ongoing training. This level of over-training can become very stressful to the employee over time. And when employees are stressed, job performance goes down.


4. Organizational learning and training
Organizational learning has been defined as a process of ‘cordinated systems change, with mechanisms built in for individuals and groups to access, build and use organizational memory, structure and culture to develop long term organizational capacity’ (Marsick,1994)
Furthermore Reynolds (2004) has described a learning culture as a ‘growth medium’ which will ‘encourage employees to commit to a range of positive discretionary behaviors, including learning’, and which has the following characteristics: empowerment not supervision, self-managed learning not instruction, long-term capacity building, not short-term fixes. As  Reynolds (2004) suggested that to create a learning culture it is necessary to develop organizational practices that raise commitment amongst employees and ‘give employees a sense of purpose in the workplace, grant employees opportunities to act upon their commitment, and offer practical support to learning’. The idea of a learning culture is associated with that of the learning organization (Reynolds, 2004).


5. Conclusion and recommendation
  • Employee training is one of the suitable methods to improve and manage employee skills according to organization’s objectives and to improve the overall organizations’ performance.
  • Organizations’ performance always depends upon performance of its employees, so effective training also plays an important role in increasing employees’ job motivation, satisfaction and commitment.
  • Training is a kind of investment that needs more time, effort and money but this investment gives long term benefits to both organizations and employees.
  • Effectiveness of training totally depends upon effectiveness and correct implementation of its model.
  • Training progarmes save time and effort and set a direction to follow for conducting trainings.
  • Training process can only be successful when participants are motivated to learn and excel their knowledge, skills and abilities.
6. Recommendation
  • Training programs should be planned carefully by aligning the objectives of training with organizational objectives.
  • Training programme must be developed to fulfill the specific needs.
  • Model should be developed by involvement of group of expert persons, HR professionals, specific department heads that needs training, trainers (if they hire earlier or select from within the organization) and trainees also to avoid any future conflict.
  • Supportive environment should be built within organization so that employees can freely communicate with their managers about their needs towards training.
  • To avoid any problem in implementation and evaluation stages, it is necessary to design and develop all training activities, materials and methods timely and accurately.
  • Disciplined environment must be given for implementation of training.
  • Evaluation of training should be conducted at the spot right after closing the training program by taking feedback from both trainer and trainees along with the evaluation conducted at workplaces.
  • Our proposed conceptual model is practical in usage because it facilitates the process of learning by making the content easy to understand, which provides the participants more alternatives to enhance their skills for the betterment of their careers.
7. References


Abdulkadir, D. et al., 2012. Effects of Strategic Performance Appraisal, Career Planning and Employee Participation on Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Study. International Business Research, 5(4), 124-133.
Antonacopoulou, E.P. and FitzGerald, L. (1996).Reframing competency in management development: a critique. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(1), pp. 27-48.
Armstrong, M. (2012). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. United Kingdom: Ashford Colour Press.
Barber J. (2004). Skill upgrading within informal training: lessons from the Indian auto mechanic. International Journal of Training and Development, 8,pp.28–39.
Bartel, A.P. (2000). Measuring the Employer’s Return on Investment in Training. Evidence from the Literature. Industrial Relations, 39(3), PP.502–524.
Brum, S., 2007. What impact does training have on employee commitment and employee turnover. Schmidt Labor Research Center Seminar Research Series, 8 (3), 84-96.
Delery, J.E. and Doty, D.H. (1996), Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency and configurational performance predictions, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), pp. 802-35
Dobbs, K. (2000, April). Tires Plus takes the training high road. Training, 37 (4), 56-63.
Elena P. Antonacopoulou, (2000), Employee development through self -development in three retail banks, Journal of Personnel Review, 29(4), pp. 491-508.
Feldman, D. (2000, May). The Dilbert syndrome: How employee cynicism about ineffective management is changing the nature of careers in organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, pp.1286-1301.
Fenn, D. (1999, February). Corporate universities for small companies. Inc, 21 (2), 95-96.
Gaille (2016), 10 Pros and Cons of Training Employees[online] Available at https://brandongaille.com/10-pros-and-cons-of-training-employees/, [Accessed on 20 September 2018]
Gerbman, R. V. (2000, February). Corporate Universities 101. HR Magazine, 45 (2), 101-106.
Garger, E. M. (1999, November). Goodbye training, hello learning Workforce, 78 (11), 35-42.
Ghafoor, R.A., Khan, F.A. & Khan, D.M.A., 2011. Impact of Training and Development on Organizational Performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(7).
Greengard, S. (2000, June). Going the distance. Workforce, 79 (6), 22-23.
Gordon, B. (1992) Are Canadian firms under in vesting in training? Canadian Business Economics 1(1), pp. 25–33.
Guest, D. (1997), Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3), pp. 263-76.
Iftikhar Ahmad and Siraj ud Din,Gomal Medical College and Gomal University, D.I.Khan,Pakistan(2009),Evaluating Training and Development.
Inc.com. (2018). 7 Ways to Improve Employee Satisfaction. [online] Available at: https://www.inc.com/guides/201105/7-ways-to-improve-employee-satisfaction.html [Accessed 8 Oct. 2018].
Impact of Training on Employee Retention. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263808540_Impact_of_Training_on_Employee_Retention [accessed Oct 05 2018].
Kinicki, A. and Kreitner, R. (2007),Organizational Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Kraiger K. (2002). Decision-based Evaluation. In Creating, Implementing, and Maintaining Effective Training and Development, State-of-the-Art Lessons for Practice, 1st ed. K Kraiger, pp. 331–75. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Kyndt,  E.  et  al.,  2009.  Employee  Retention:  Organizational  and  Personal Perspectives. Vocations and Learning, 2, 195-215.
Landy, F. W. (1985).The psychology of work behavior, 3rd ed. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Lionbridge (2014), Top 5 Training and Development Challenges [online] Available at http://content.lionbridge.com/top-td-challenges-address/, [Accessed on 20 September 2018]
Saul McLeod (2017), Kolb's Learning Styles and Experiential Learning Cycle [online] Available at on https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html[Accessed on 13 September 2018]
Logan, J. K. (2000, April). Retention tangibles and intangibles: More meaning in work is essential, but good chair massages won’t hurt. Training and Development, 54 (4), pp.48-50.
Marsick, V J (1994) Trends in managerial invention: creating a learning map, Management Learning, 21(1), pp 11–33 .
McKinsey Quarterly (2006), An executive take on the top business trends, a McKinsey Global Survey.
Meister, J. C. (1998, November). Ten steps to creating a corporate university. Training and Development, 52(11), 38-43.
Nunn, J. (2000, September/October). Career planning key to employee retention. Journal of Property Management, 65 (5), 20-21.
Pfeffer, J. (1994),Competitive Advantage through People, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Purcell, J., Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Rayton, B. and Swart, J. (2003),Understanding the People and Performance Link: Unlocking the Black-Box. Research Report, CIPD, London.
Reynolds, J (2004) Helping People Learn, CIPD, London
Rosenwald, M. (2000, October 15) Working class: More companies are creating corporate universities to help employees sharpen skills and learn new ones. Boston Globe, H1.
Sadaf Zahra, Amna Iram and Hummayoun Naeem (2014) Employee Training and ItsEffect on Employees' Job Motivation and Commitment: Developing andProposing a Conceptual Model, 6(1), pp. 60-68
Sahinidis, A. & Bouris, J., 2008. Employee perceived training effectiveness relationship to employee attitudes. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(1), 63-76.
Satterfield JM, Hughes E. (2007). Emotion skills training for medical students: a systematic review. Medical Education, 41:935–41.
Schuler, R.S., and MacMillan, I.C. (1984). Gaining Competitive Advantage through Human Resource Management Practices. Human Resource Management, 23, 3, 241–255.
Sloman, M (2003) E-learning: stepping up the learning curve, Impact, CIPD, January, pp 16–17
Stone R J. (2002), Human Resource Management 2nd Edition, Jhon Wiley & Sons 2002.
Tai, W. T., (2006). Effects of Training Framing, General Self-efficacy and Training Motivation on Trainees’ Training Effectiveness, Emerald Group Publishers, 35(1), pp. 51-65.
Valle, R., Martı´n, F., Romero, P.M. and Dolan, S. (2000), “Business strategy, work processes and human resource training: are they congruent?”,Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, pp. 283-97
Wagner, S. (2000, August). Retention: Finders, keepers. Training and Development, 54 (8), 64.
Wilson, C. (2000, July 26). More companies recognize the impact of learning centers. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, C8.
Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. and Lepak, D.P. (1996), “Human resource management, manufacturing strategy and firm performance”,Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 836-66.

44 comments:

  1. Hi Gayanee,Job Well done.Your blog has covered the key aspects of Learning & Development. After all I believe that Training needs assessment as well.Noe (2013) indicates that training needs assessment concerns the process of finding out if training is required/needed or not. Three analyses are performed: employee (personal),
    organizational and task (job) analyses. Firdousi (2011) is of the view that training needs analysis is used to investigate the educational courses or activities to be given to both employees and
    management in a bid to enhance their delivery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I agree with your comment Akila, Barbazette (2006) says, that training needs assessment is the process of collecting data to training employee in order to achieve organizational needs. McConnell (2003) highlighted that training needs analysis is needed when there are changes in the system or in the work, when new technology is initiated, when new government’s standards are introduced, when there is decline in the quality of work or performance, when there is lack of skills and knowledge and when there is lack of motivation.

      Delete
  2. Gayanee, your blog is clearly emphasize the effects of implementing proper training and development in an organisation that has a greater propensity to increase employee engagement through effective performance management. In addition Herman and Kurt (2009) consider
    training as the systematic approach to affecting individuals’ knowledge, skills, and attitude in order to improve individual, team, and organizational effectiveness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment Lasitha. According to Armstrong (2012) training as the systematic presentation of formal processes to impart knowledge and help workers to obtain required skills for them to perform their jobs satisfactorily. This definition corroborated with Olakunle and Ehi (2008), who see training as the methodical development of the knowledge, skill and attitude required by an individual employee to perform effectively on a given task or job.

      Delete
  3. I agree with your idea about learning and training. It is one of the major factors that could help to increase the productivity of the organization directly or indirectly. I accept your statement about connecting the training and learning with the performance appraisal. According to Paul, Abeguki, Hezekiah and JoyIfiavor (2014), the performance appraisal will be helpful to identify the areas where the employees need to be trained. Therefore, for an effective training and learning procedure I recommend the organization should do a proper systematic performance appraisal first.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Vayanga. I agree with you. Performance Appraisal has been considered as the most significant an indispensable tool for an organization, for the information it provides is highly useful in making decisions regarding various personnel aspects such as promotion and value increases.

      That employee performance is the Important factor and the building block which increases the performance of overall organization. Employee performance depends on many factors like job satisfaction, knowledge and management. But there is a relationship between training and performance (Chris Amisano,2010).This shows that employee performance is essential for the performance of the organization and the training & development is advantageous for the employee to improve their performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to show the impact training & development on the employee performance

      Delete
  4. Gayanee, Your blog emphasizes in all areas of Learning and Training Employees for the betterment of the Organizations. Training is the process of teaching employees the basic skills they need to perform their jobs or for developing additional skills. The firms training programs must makes sense in terms of the companies strategic goal. Training programs must also support Performance Management. This is a integrated goal oriented approach for assigning, assessing and rewarding performance. Training is one way to help an employee meet their performance goals as you have explained in the training process. According to Dipak (2011) Training Programs are so designed, that it can meet the skill and knowledge gap, as could be Identified through the performance management process.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the commenting. Mangers are planning their level best to develop the capabilities, to creating good working environment within the organization (Farooq and Aslam,2011). For the sake of capacity creating managers are involved in developing the effective training programs for their employees to equip them with the desired knowledge, skills and abilities to achieve organizational goals. This struggle by the top management not only improves the employee performance but also creates positive image of the firm worldwide, (Jia-Fang, 2010).

      Delete
  5. Hi Gayanee, you have clearly explained the effectiveness of learning and training for employees in your blog. However, the organizations do not always offer the right training forms and contents for their employees and the wrong allocation of training contents and training forms can be considered as one of the main causes for the lower effectiveness of training provided to the employees. Especially, training provided for the older employees of an organization is less effective since it appears that the older employees pursue less ambitious goals with their participation in training activities carried out by the organization (Zwick, 2011).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Dinuka for the comment made and I agree with you. But It is very necessary for the organization to design the training very carefully (MichaelArmstrong, 2000). The design of the training should be according to the needs of the employees (Ginsberg, 1997). Those organizations which develop a good training design according to the need of the employees as well as to the organization always get good results (Partlow, 1996; Tihanyi,2000; Boudreauet, 2001).

      Delete
  6. Key parameters influencing effective L & D practice incldes scale of organizational setting. Price (2007) described the relationship between organizational scale and HRD practices, where larger organizations are more positive towards potential benefits of L&D, although small to medium enterprises are placing more value on L&D in their business strategy. Secondly organizational engagement to L&D may vary with the extent to which the organization adopts strategic versus traditional approach (CIPD, 2015). The emerging theory of HRD and OD strategic approach to L&D would be the most effective way to activate human potential for organizational growth where there is alignment between different L&D initiatives and programmes within an organization.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the comment and I exactly agree with you Samanthi. It is therefore in the organizations responsibility to enhance the job performance of the employees and certainly implementation of training and development is one of the major steps that most companies need to achieve this. As is evident that employees are a crucial resource, it is important to optimize the contribution of employees to the company aims and goals as a means of sustaining effective performance. This therefore calls for managers to ensure an adequate supply of staff that is technically and socially competent and capable of career development into specialist departments or management positions (Afshan, Sobia, Kamran & Nasir 2012, 646).

      Delete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Gayanee, The Learning and Training attracting the interests of corporations as a potential way to enhance training effectiveness. According to (Bachvarova et al, 2012), there are three factors which needs to be looked at when designing learning with corporate training;
      The current situation of modern organizations
      The different stakeholders in corporate training
      and
      Relations between features and how they impact learning

      Delete
    2. Thank you for comment Ruwini. There are some factors which affect training effectiveness both positively and negatively (Punia & Kant, 2013). It also different from physical and financial investments, investment in training brings a distinct advantage to organizations because training enhances organizational performance. It does this through increasing the skills, motivation and knowledge of employees. Thus, the intellectual capital of organizations is increased. Moreover, it is argued that training within organizations creates a resource that is more valuable than any other, that is, committed employees (Jex & Britt, 2008).

      Delete
  8. Gayanee, you have illustrated effectiveness of learning and training of employees in your blog critically. As another aspect, there are certain factors influencing your subject. According to Birdi (2005) there are two factors affecting to the effective training. These are Individual factors and organizational factors. Driskell (2011) stated that way of training conducted, training content and training expertise equally affect the results of training.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Certainly agree with your comments Shiran, As mention training content and quality of the the training is very important for effectiveness of training. Another aspect of delivery style is a very important part of Training and Development (Carlos,1995). Employees are well knowledgeable about the delivery style (Michael, 2000). If someone is not delivering the training in an impressive style and he/she is not capturing the attention of the audience it is means he/she is wasting the time (Mark A. Griffin et al., 2000). It is very important for a trainer to engage its audience during the training session (Phillipseamen et al., 2005).

      Delete
  9. Well done Gayanee, you have managed to capture the most important areas on learning, training and development. However Return on Investment (ROI) measurement is one of the methods to evaluate the effectiveness of a training and development programme (Sachdeva*, 2014). Executives and Programme Directors that have watched their training budget grow without appropriate accountability measures are now demanding a ROI on training investment (Rohs,2004,p.29).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Bernadine. Why an organization invest for employee training, that trainings increase or develop the managerial skills (Robart and Frank, 1998).Organizations spending on training should increase on efficiency and cost control, because organization get more efficiency , effectiveness out of the training and development (workforce special report, 2006) .This shows that training increase the efficiency and the effectiveness of the organization.

      Delete
  10. Hi Gayanee,
    Interesting Topic & Valuable content. As you share Learning and training increase the stress level of employee instead of Motivation is very important and valid point. In present working environment this reason can be seen amply and all employers must pay their attention on this. Because Business success is based on many factors and the most important to have competent, skillful and motivated workforce. These skills, competencies, knowledge and motivation can be enhanced through training (Adam, 1963). Therefore training and learning must be designed in order to increase the motivation
    Further Swart et al, says organizations are needed to retain human asset by keeping them motivated through effective trainings for further development and to enhance their skills for betterment and success of the company (Swart et al, 2005)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Suresh. Improved capabilities, knowledge and skills of the talented workforce proved to be a major source of competitive advantage in a global market (McKinsey, 2006). To develop the desired knowledge, skills and abilities of the workers, to perform well on the job, requires effective training programs that may also effect employee motivation and commitment (Meyer and Allen, 1991)

      Delete
  11. Dear Gayanee, I totally agreed what you have pointed out on effectiveness in learning and Training for employees, it is true that there can be disadvantages in training were organization will spend lots of resources but the benefit will goes to some were else. This is mainly due to the reason of not analyzing and determining the actual need of leaning and development of the organization. According to Armstrong (2006) by identified the actual need and structuring the leaning and development of the organization and recognizing these employees, empowering them rewording can mitigate these disadvantages.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Charith. Organization always get better advantage which develop a good training design according to the need of the workers as well as to the organization. (Partlow, 1996; Tihanyi et al., 2000; Boudreau et al., 2001). It seems that Training design plays a very essential role in the employee as well as organizational performance. The unplanned training design is nothing but the loss of time and money (Tsaur and Lin, 2004).

      Delete
  12. Gayanee, your efforts are commendable in elaborating the importance of L & D in HRM context. It is further learnt that L & D should align with the strategy of the organization & ensure that employees have the relevant skills and knowledge needed to be able to execute the HR strategy (Mavin et al, 2010).

    This is a continuous process. As and when the strategies are updated or refocused it will be necessary to review the learning and development processes as well and therefore an ongoing dialogue is needed between those responsible for learning and development and the management of the organization. The Kirkpatrick Model helps organizations to carry out such exercise to align the L & D with strategy. And the knowledge of similar models will further improve such alignments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Amal, I agree with your comment, where the Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model could help objectively analyze the effectiveness and impact of organization training.
      According to Farooq. M, & Aslam. M. K (2011), managers are trying their level best to develop the employee’s capabilities, ultimately creating good working environment within the organization. For the sake of capacity developing managers are participating in develop the effective training programs for their employees to equip them with the desired knowledge, skills and abilities to achieve organizational goals. This effort by the top management not only improves the worker performance but also creates positive image of the organization worldwide, (Jia-Fang, 2010).

      Delete
  13. Learning and development(L&D) is one of the key areas that successful organization have made provisions on their Strategic Human Resources Management process. L&D directly affects individual productivity and performance which determines the firms success. Therefore the importance of cultivating a Learning culture among the organization is critically stated by Armstrong M,(2009,p.175-182)

    The blog successfully describes important arears where it is truly relevant to its topic in a complete manner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I agree with you comment Chaminda, effective training programs helps employees to get familiarity with the desired new technological advancement, also gaining full command on the abilities and skills required to perform at s particular job and to void on the job errors and mistakes (Robert, 2006).

      Delete
  14. Well done. Your blog has been covered important key aspects of Learning and development which is vital for any organization. I believe that employees will leave their work place when they are no longer Leaning and development. Even old employees or new employees it is essential to arrange a training sessions to increase their Morales. Employee development is a shared responsibility of management and individual employees.

    Selan Bank is allocating training programs for their employees when they giving yearly appraisals. Every organization should identity the necessity of training and development for their employees to increase the productivity and the motivations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Udeni, It is very difficult for an employee to perform well at the job place without any per-training (Thomas N. Garavan, 1997).The Seylan bank is identified training needs of the employees and provide per-training for their employees. Trained employees perform well as compared to untrained employees (Partlow, 1996; Tihanyi etal.,2000; Boudreau et l.,2001).

      Delete
  15. Hi Gayanee you have clearly identified effective learning and training can help the employee to gain efficiency through performance management. Reynolds (2004: 3) observed that: The simple act of observing more experienced colleagues can accelerate learning; conversing, swapping stories, cooperating on tasks and offering mutual support deepen and solidify the process... This kind of learning – often very informal in nature – is thought to be vastly more effective in building proficiency than more formalized training methods.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Mohan, It is very necessary for any organization to give its employees training to get overall goals of the organization in a better way (Flynn et al.,1995; Kaynak, 2003; Heras, 2006). Training and development increase the overall performance of the organization (Shepard, Jon et al., 2003)

      Delete
  16. Dear Gayanee , You have clearly mentioned effectiveness of Training and Learning to the Company and also Employee , Thus Training presents a prime opportunity to expand the knowledge base of all employees, but many employers in the current climate find development opportunities expensive. Employees attending training sessions also miss out on work time which may delay the completion of projects. However despite these potential drawbacks, training and development provides both the individual and organisations as a whole with benefits that make the cost and time a worthwhile investment. The return on investment from training and development of employees is really a no brainer (Stone , 2002)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment Ajantha, In addition Bartel (1994), reports that there is a positive correlation between effective training program and employee productivity, however to make it achievable, (Swart et al., 2005), it is the responsibility of the managers to identify the factors that prevents training program effectiveness and should take necessary measures to neutralize their effect on employee performance

      Delete
  17. Hi Gayanee , Well descriptive Blog on the Effectiveness of Learning and Training for Employees . I totally agree with your explanations ,where the Effective training practices should establish to gain the expected outcome ,benefits from particular training or training programs . The focus of the training should be to develop transferable skills. The training should be evaluated on the basis of the extent to which it has achieved its purpose (Armstrong and Taylor , 2014) .Lack of Effectiveness of the Learning and Training processes incur only a cost to the organization .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I agree with your comment Kasun , However it is costly to give training to the employees. But in the long run it give back more than benefits to organization. (Flynn et al.,1995; Kaynak, 2003; Heras, 2006). All organizations should develop its employees according to the need of current situation. So that they could compete with their competitors (Carlos A. Primo Braga, 1995)

      Delete
  18. Gayanee you have very well described the necessity of learning and development. It is when an employee if fully equipped with the required knowledge and skills that he or she can contribute significantly. However, as discussed in the Blog, the level of absorbing the knowledge that is to be imparted with various training and development programs conducted differs from one to the other. Hence, in order to retain those who absorb more and faster who would eventually become the nucleus of the company has to be taken care of. “if the company wishes to reduce the chances of its employees expressing intentions to leave, it is important that they are highly satisfied with their job and company as a whole. They also recommended that having a standard payment policy and effective ways of supervising as methods of reducing turnover intentions” (mbah and Ikemefuna, 2012).

    ReplyDelete
  19. GAYANE You have presented in a attractive manner which elaborate the theory .In the view of Armstrong (2014: 284), development is considered as the growth or realization of person’s ability and the potential through the provision of learning and educational experiences.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Pedler et al (1991) state that a learning organization is one ‘which facilitates the learning of all its members and continually transforms itself’.A learning culture is one that promotes learning because it is recognized by top management, line managers and employees generally as an essential organizational process to which they are committed and in which they engage continuously.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Gayanee Thennakoon Many researches have conducted studies on the impact of an efficient Training & Development structure within organizations. One of the interesting findings in these studies, claimed that there is a direct link between employees’ attitudes and the perceived capabilities or skills for specific a job role and how this realization can be a motivational factor for job performance proficiencies at later stages. If there is a mismatch between perceived capability to the actual skills required performing a job, dissatisfaction can occur with a higher risk of employee turn over. Therefore, it vital that in any T&D program that expectations are clearly cited and competencies required are addressed from the early stages (Truitt, 2011).

    ReplyDelete
  22. Organisations which are intense to develop their productivity, efficiency and profitability will look to move beyond mandatory training and look at more varied learning and development activities which will enable the employees to maximise their potential and provide a valuable resource for the organisation. Learning and development can be a source of competitive advantage where employees gain appropriate new knowledge and skills (Towler and Dipboye, 2009) which provides a strong argument for organisations to invest in their employees so that they can reap the benefits and differentiate themselves from their competitors.

    ReplyDelete
  23. It was a nice read Gayanee, however according to (John P, 2005)stated that High performance working practices consist of new ways of organizing work. Rewarding performance and involving employees in the decision-making process in the workplace. The practices include self-directed teams, performance-related pay, 360-degree appraisal, personal development plans, job rotation, employee involvement with decision-making, and support for performance: that is, training and development.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Good work Gayanee.Training should have a purpose — To inform, to teach, to improve, and to teach Introducing evaluation and tying it to performance will identify if learning has occurred during and after training, and if job performance improvements have been realized. Measuring improvements in job performance will also provide valuable data for measuring the cost-benefits to the organization.No programs are developed and implemented unless they are guaranteed to produce results that are identified as critical to the organization.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Dear Gayanee,I highly agreed with you as you have mentioned Training is an Investment which gives long term benefit to both employee and the organization.Employee training and development has emerged as a major educational enterprise over the past three decades. This increase is associated with a demand in the workplace for employee at all levels to improve performance in their present jobs to acquire skills and knowledge to do new jobs, and to continue their career progress in a changing world of work(Armstrong,2001).Training effects employee's job performance positively. Training is a motivational factor which enhances the knowledge of the employee towards the job by which employees become proficient in their jobs and they become able to give better results.Training has direct relationship with the employees' performance. A significant relationship was found between the employees training and their resultant performance in accomplishing different tasks. By the help of training employees become proficient in their jobs and they become able to give better results(Bhat,2013).

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hi Gayanee, this is a very comprehensive blog. Training is a long term investment for any organization and it will enhances company reputation and profile by having a strong and successful training strategy helps to develop your employer brand and make your company a prime consideration for graduates and mid-career changes. Training also makes a company more attractive to potential new recruits who seek to improve their skills and the opportunities associated with those new skills (International Journal of Management and International Business Studies, 2014).

    ReplyDelete