Introduction
Organizations improved capabilities, knowledge, and skills
of talented employees proved to be a major source of competitive advantage in
the global market (McKinsey, 2006). Hence, training is delivered by an
organization or external services. Training is a type of activity that is
planned, systematic and it results in an enhanced level of skill, knowledge,
and competency that is necessary to perform work effectively (Gordon, 1992).
Training as the systematic application of formal processes to impart knowledge
and help employees to acquire requisite skills for them to perform employee
jobs satisfactorily (Armstrong, 2012).
Employee development activities are very important for
employees, as the activities are performed, it indicates that an organization
cares about employees and wants them to develop (Elena, 2000). Training and
development is increased employee performance, that training and development
are important activity to improve the performance of the organization (Ahmad
and Siraj-ud-din, 2009). When an employee learning developed by the individual
through experience. Employee development depends upon the individual employee
whether the employee is willing to participate or not. Employee development
also depends upon the organization's culture, the attitude of top management,
and limited opportunities for promotion (Elena, 2000; Antonacopoulou, 1996).
Training and development program is a responsibility of the organizations to
provide opportunities to employees but the individual should take initiative to
use those opportunities for the betterment of their future career (Garger,
1999).
As a Kolb's Learning Cycle there are four stages of
effective learning in an employee individual progresses. (1) having a
concrete experience followed by (2) observation of and reflection on that
experience which leads to (3) the formation of abstract concepts (analysis) and
generalizations (conclusions) which are then (4) used to test the hypothesis in
future situations, resulting in new experiences.
Figure 01: Kolb's Learning Cycle
(Source: Saul, 2017)
Experience
Experience in a leading Software Company, they have given
technical, new tools, new language and process training for their employees. The
company is provided various training sessions for employees to develop their
carrier and shaping their knowledge. After training sessions employees could be
able to use their gained knowledge to develop an innovative software product
and carter to future markets.
Reflective Observation
The Organization is started new product development can be
used new technology for developments. Set up a team with having technology
savvy and assign them to a development task. The employee who had the training
can include innovative software developments. Some employees are naturally good
at reflection. Some of them train themselves to be more deliberate about
reviewing their experiences and recording them. Finally releasing a new product
to an organization or market.
The formation of abstract concepts
After developing new products, employees lean by experience
and they can teach others as well. All staff exchange their experience and
knowledge with their teams and apply for an existing product.
Active experimentation
After learn from training employees apply those techniques
into new products and use knowledge into future developments.
Reference
Ahmad I. and Siraj ud Din, (2009) ,Evaluating
Training and Development, Gomal Medical College and Gomal University,
D.I.Khan,Pakistan.
Antonacopoulou, E.P. and FitzGerald, L.
(1996).Reframing competency in management development: a critique. Human
Resource Management Journal, 6(1), pp. 27-48.
Armstrong, M. (2012). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human
Resource Management Practice. United Kingdom: Ashford Colour Press.
Elena P. Antonacopoulou, (2000), Employee
development through self -development in three retail banks, Journal of
Personnel Review, 29(4), pp. 491-508.
Elena P. Antonacopoulou, (2000), Employee
development through self -development in three retail banks, Journal of
Personnel Review, 29(4), pp. 491-508.
Garger, E. M. (1999, November). Goodbye training,
hello learning Workforce, 78 (11), 35-42.
Gordon, B. (1992) Are Canadian firms under in
vesting in training? Canadian Business Economics 1(1), pp. 25–33.
McKinsey Quarterly (2006), An executive take on the
top business trends, a McKinsey Global Survey.
Saul McLeod (2017), Kolb's Learning
Styles and Experiential Learning Cycle [online] Available at on https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html[Accessed on 13 September
2018]

This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteKey parameters influencing effective L & D practice incldes scale of organizational setting. Price (2007) described the relationship between organizational scale and HRD practices, where larger organizations are more positive towards potential benefits of L&D, although small to medium enterprises are placing more value on L&D in their business strategy. Secondly organizational engagement to L&D may vary with the extent to which the organization adopts strategic versus traditional approach (CIPD, 2015). The emerging theory of HRD and OD strategic approach to L&D would be the most effective way to activate human potential for organizational growth where there is alignment between different L&D initiatives and programmes within an organization.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the comment and I exactly agree with you Samanthi. It is therefore in the organizations responsibility to enhance the job performance of the employees and certainly implementation of training and development is one of the major steps that most companies need to achieve this. As is evident that employees are a crucial resource, it is important to optimize the contribution of employees to the company aims and goals as a means of sustaining effective performance. This therefore calls for managers to ensure an adequate supply of staff that is technically and socially competent and capable of career development into specialist departments or management positions (Afshan, Sobia, Kamran & Nasir 2012, 646).
DeleteGayanee, your blog is clearly emphasize the effects of implementing proper training and development in an organisation that has a greater propensity to increase employee engagement through effective performance management. In addition Herman and Kurt (2009) consider
ReplyDeletetraining as the systematic approach to affecting individuals’ knowledge, skills, and attitude in order to improve individual, team, and organizational effectiveness.
Thanks for the comment Lasitha. According to Armstrong (2012) training as the systematic presentation of formal processes to impart knowledge and help workers to obtain required skills for them to perform their jobs satisfactorily. This definition corroborated with Olakunle and Ehi (2008), who see training as the methodical development of the knowledge, skill and attitude required by an individual employee to perform effectively on a given task or job.
Delete